Racial Equality and the Abolition of Slavery in France :: Exploratory Essays Research Papers

Racial Equality and the Abolition of Slavery in France When Abb Siyes wondered, What is the Third Estate or be slaves? Nothing. What has it have they been until now in the political order? Nothing. What does it do they want? To be become something (65), he could have just as easily spoken of slaves misery sort of than the Third Estates plight. While, his scope was limited, his pains were non. Following their first revolution, the French National Assembly helped to change the world. Enlightened, they saw, they defined, they tried to ease all of mankinds suffering. Finally, the term man began to clear color. If man has rights, they must apply to all men. And thus, the concept of racial equality is born. I will argue in order to achieve this end, and to prove the necessary of racial equality, Enlightened thinkers exposed flaws in current social philosophy, demonstrated the logical conclusions of their progress, and finally addressed the implications of abolition. Marquis de Condorc et was an outspoken advocate for all forms of homophile rights-religious, gender, political and especially racial. In his Dedicatory Epistle to the Negro Slaves he writesMy Friends, Although I am not the same color as you, I have always regarded you as my brothers. Nature formed us with the same spirit, the same reason, the same virtues as whitesYour tyrants will reproach meindeed, nothing is more common than the maxims of humanity and justice trim back a man to slaverytakes from the slave not only all forms of property but also the ability to acquire it (56).Condorcet employs the technique of de/humanizing his subjects to display the despotic nature of slavery. Moderates, slaves, and whites-anyone could achieve slave status under these random means. Society needs to prevent subordination. The white Condorcet speaks almost in apostrophe the style of his introduction greatly resembles an ode. Addressing the slaves in this manner gives even more deference to the lowly slaves. Simil arly, the slaves have been elevated to My Friends, further humanizing their cause. Although Condorcet was a well-respected member of the National Assembly, he relates to the slaves how he is not one of the them. The ordered diction again serves to equate a white man to a slave. This segments tone lacks both condescension and sarcasm. He nearly supplicates to the slaves for their quintessence. His friends-the blacks-are his brethren. If he shares spirit, virtues, and reasons with slaves, what is to distinguish them?